DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS); Follow-On Production Contracts to Awardees of "Other Transactions"
SOURCE: Federal Register, June 8, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 110, page 31907
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD)
ACTION: Final Rule
SYNOPSIS: DOD is amending DFARS 206.001, Applicability, to provide an exception from competition to participants in an "other transaction" (OT) agreement for a prototype project, if the OT agreement was entered into through competitive procedures and it provided for at least one-third non-federal cost share. This change implements Section 822 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107).
EDITOR'S NOTE: The regulations for OTs ("transactions other than contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements for prototype projects") are in Title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Part 3, Transactions Other Than Contracts, Grants, or Cooperative Agreements for Prototype Projects.
For more on the proposed rule being finalized, see the June 3, 2003, FEDERAL CONTRACTS DISPATCH "Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS); Follow-On Production Contracts to Awardees of 'Other Transactions'."
For more on the addition of 32 CFR 3.9, Follow-On Production Contracts, to implement Section 822, see the March 30, 2004, FEDERAL CONTRACTS DISPATCH "Department of Defense; Follow-On Production Contracts to Awardees of 'Other Transactions'."
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 8, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thaddeus Godlewski, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062; 703-602-2022; fax: 703-602-0350.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160) authorized the secretary of a military department, the director of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and any other official designated by the Secretary of Defense, to enter into "transactions other than contracts, grants or cooperative agreements for prototype projects that are directly relevant to weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense." These are commonly referred to as "other transactions" (OTs) and they are generally exempt from all the statutes and regulations that govern federal contracts and grants. The purpose of OTs is to overcome the reluctance of many firms with significant technological advances and innovations to share their innovations with the government because of the significant statutory and regulatory requirements involved in government contracts and grants. When using OTs, DOD contracting officials are not required to include standard contract provisions that typically address such issues as financial management or intellectual property rights, but may structure the agreements as they consider appropriate.
Use of OTs is authorized by law in the absence of the significant participation of a nontraditional defense contractor, and when at least one-third of the costs of the prototype project are to be provided by non-federal parties to the agreement. The authority granted by Section 822 of Public Law 107-107 provides the authority to continue such prototype projects into production without competition under the following conditions:
To provide the corresponding exemption from DFARS Part 206, Competition Requirements, for follow-on production contracts awarded under the authority of Section 822, DOD published a proposed rule on June 3, 2003, to amend DFARS 206.001 by exempting an OT agreement when: (1) it includes provisions for a follow-on production contract; (2) the contracting officer establishes quantities and prices for the follow-on production contract that do not exceed the quantities and target prices established in the other transaction agreement; and (2) the contracting officer receives sufficient information from the agreements officer and the project manager for the prototype OT agreement documenting that all the other conditions have been met.
Two respondents submitted comments, but the proposed rule is adopted as final with one editorial correction.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panoptic Enterprises at 703-451-5953 or by e-mail to Panoptic@FedGovContracts.com.
Return to the Dispatches Library.
Return to the Main Page.